文章摘要
不同暗示语言防治患儿丙泊酚注射痛效果的比较
Comparison of the effects of different implied languages in the prevention and treatment of propofol injection pain in children
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2020.06.011
中文关键词: 注射痛  丙泊酚  暗示  语言  焦虑评分
英文关键词: Injection pain  Propofol  Suggestion  Language  Anxiety score
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
吴祎洁 310003,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院麻醉科  
王志琴 杭州市儿童医院手术室  
方向明 310003,浙江大学医学院附属第一医院麻醉科 xmfang@zju.edu.cn 
摘要点击次数: 2830
全文下载次数: 611
中文摘要:
      
目的 探讨不同语言暗示在患儿丙泊酚注射时对疼痛反应的影响。
方法 选取我院拟接受全麻下择期手术的患儿151例,男140例,女11例,年龄4~12岁,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,随机分为两组:“一般工作语言”组(N组)和 “积极语言”组(P组)。两组患儿在丙泊酚推注前分别给予不同的暗示语言。N组被告知:“我现在要在你手上推麻醉药,你的手臂会有点刺痛,你有不舒服就说,不要动来动去。” P组被告知:“现在我要在你手上推麻醉药,你的手臂可能会有点凉凉麻麻的,这个过程很舒服。”采用视觉模拟焦虑量表(VAS-A)评估患儿在手术床上躺平时(T1)以及暗示语言干预后(T2)时的焦虑评分,采用四分法记录丙泊酚推注时的疼痛分级。
结果 与T1时比较,T2时P组焦虑评分明显降低(P<0.05),N组焦虑评分明显升高(P<0.05)。T2时P组焦虑评分明显低于N组(P<0.05)。P组疼痛发生率明显低于N组(P<0.05)。
结论 与一般工作语言比较,积极语言可明显减轻患儿焦虑感,并降低丙泊酚推注时疼痛发生率。
英文摘要:
      
Ojective To compare the effect of pain relief in children via two different verbal communications before propofol injection.
Methods A total of 151 children undergoing elective surgery, 140 males and 11 females, aged 4-12 years, falling into ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, were collected in this study. They were randomly divided into two groups. One group was communicated with a negative language (group N), the child was told immediately before i.v. propofol “I’m going to inject anesthetics on your hand now. You will have a stabbing pain on your arm. If you feel uncomfortable, just speak out, don’t move around”. The other group was communicated with a possitive language (group P), the child was told immediately before i.v. propofol “Now I’m going to inject the anesthetic on your hand. You may feel a little cold and numb. It’s a comfortable process”. The visual analog anxiety scale (VAS-A) was used to evaluate the anxiety scores of children lying flat on the operating bed (T1) and after suggestive language intervention (T2). Injection pain was measured by a four point scale.
Results Compared with T1, the anxiety score in group P was significantly decreased (P < 0.05), and the anxiety score in group N was significantly increased at T2(P < 0.05). Compared with group N, the anxiety value in group P was significantly lower at T2. The incidence of pain in group P was statistically lower than that in group N (P < 0.05).
Conclusion Positive language is more helpful in reducing anxiety and the incidence of propofol injection pain.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭