文章摘要
不同浓度亚甲蓝复合罗哌卡因竖脊肌平面阻滞对乳腺癌改良根治术患者早期恢复质量的影响
Effects of different concentrations of methylene blue combined with ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block on quality of early recovery in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2025.05.009
中文关键词: 亚甲蓝  竖脊肌平面阻滞  乳腺癌改良根治术  术后镇痛  早期恢复质量
英文关键词: Methylene blue  Erector spinae plane block  Modified radical mastectomy  Postoperative analgesia  Quality of early recovery
基金项目:江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(H2023016);南京医科大学康达学院科研发展基金项目(KD2022KYJJZD144)
作者单位E-mail
刘静 222042,南京医科大学康达学院附属连云港东方医院麻醉科  
程芳 222042,南京医科大学康达学院附属连云港东方医院麻醉科  
朱霞 222042,南京医科大学康达学院附属连云港东方医院麻醉科  
孙建宏 扬州大学附属医院麻醉科 jianhongsun@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 308
全文下载次数: 98
中文摘要:
      
目的:探讨不同浓度亚甲蓝复合罗哌卡因竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对乳腺癌改良根治术患者术后镇痛和早期恢复质量的影响。
方法:选择2022年6月至2023年11月择期行乳腺癌改良根治术的女性患者78例,年龄20~64岁,BMI 18.5~30.0 kg/m2,ASA Ⅰ—Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者分为三组:0.025%亚甲蓝+0.25%罗哌卡因30 ml组(M1组)、0.05%亚甲蓝+0.25%罗哌卡因30 ml组(M2组)和0.25%罗哌卡因30 ml组(R组),每组26例。麻醉诱导前30 min行ESPB。记录拔管后30 min、术后24 h、48 h、1周、1个月和3个月静息和活动(上肢外展)时VAS疼痛评分。记录手术时间、术中出血量、PACU停留时间以及术后48 h内补救镇痛例数。采用15项恢复质量(QoR-15)量表记录术前1 d及术后1、2 d恢复情况。出院当天采用5分制Likert量表记录患者术后总体满意度评分。记录术后48 h内恶心、呕吐、阻滞区域疼痛、穿刺部位感染、血肿、局麻药中毒等不良反应的发生情况。
结果:与R组比较,M1组和M2组在术后24 h、48 h、1周、1个月、3个月静息和活动时VAS疼痛评分均明显降低,术中瑞芬太尼用量明显减少,术后补救镇痛率明显降低,术后1、2 d QoR-15评分均明显升高(P<0.05);M1组PACU停留时间明显缩短,满意度评分明显升高,术后恶心发生率明显降低(P<0.05)。与M2组比较,M1组PACU停留时间明显缩短,术后1、2 d QoR-15评分和满意度评分明显升高,术后恶心发生率明显降低(P<0.05)。三组术后48 h呕吐和阻滞区域疼痛差异无统计学意义,三组均未出现穿刺部位感染、血肿和局麻药中毒。
结论:0.025%和0.05%亚甲蓝复合0.25%罗哌卡因ESPB能减轻乳腺癌改良根治术患者术后疼痛程度和延长镇痛时间,促进患者早期康复,使用0.025%亚甲蓝复合0.25%罗哌卡因行ESPB具有更高的舒适性和安全性。
英文摘要:
      
Objective: To explore the effect of different concentrations of methylene blue combined with ropivacaine for erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on postoperative analgesia and quality of early recovery in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.
Methods: Seventy-eight female patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy from June 2022 to November 2023, aged 20-64 years, BMI 18.5-30.0 kg/m2, ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ, were divided into three groups by random number table method: 0.025% methylene blue combined with 0.25% ropivacaine 30 ml group (group M1), 0.05% methylene blue group combined with 0.25% ropivacaine 30 ml group (group M2), and 0.25% ropivacaine 30 ml group (group R), 26 patients in each group. ESPB was performed 30 minutes before anesthesia induction. VAS pain scores at rest and during activity (upper limb abduction) 30 minutes after extubation, 24 hours, 48 hours, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation were recorded. The operation time, the intraoperative amount of bleeding, the PACU stay time and the number of rescue analgesia within 48 hours after operation were recorded. The quality of recovery-15 scale (QoR-15) scale was used to assess the quality of early rehabilitation 1 day before surgery, 1 day and 2 days after surgery. On the day of hospital discharge, a 5-point Likert scale was used to assess patient's satisfaction. Adverse reactions, including nausea, vomiting, block area pain, puncture site infection, hematoma, and local anesthetic intoxation within 48 hours after surgery were also recorded.
Results: Compared with group R, VAS pain scores at rest and during activity in groups M1 and M2 were significantly decreased 24 hours, 48 hours, 1 week, 1 month and 3 months after operation, the intraoperative remifentanil consumption was significantly decreased, the rate of analgesia relief was significantly reduced within 48 hours after surgery, the QoR-15 scores 1 day and 2 days after surgery were significantly increased (P < 0.05), the PACU stay time in group M1 was significantly shortened, the patient satisfaction was significantly increased, and the incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). Compared with group M2, the PACU stay time in group M1 was significantly shortened, the QoR-15 scores and patient's satisfaction 1 day and 2 days after surgery were significantly increased, and the incidence of postoperative nausea was significantly decreased (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences among the three groups in incidence of postoperative vomiting and block area pain. No puncture site infection, hematoma, and local anesthetic intoxation occurred in the three groups.
Conclusion: 0.025% and 0.05% methylene blue combined with 0.25% ropivacaine for ESPB can reduce postoperative pain, prolong analgesia time in patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy, and promote quality of early recovery. The use of 0.025% methylene blue combined with 0.25% ropivacaine in ESPB has higher comfort and safety.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭