文章摘要
瑞马唑仑与环泊酚在老年患者诱导后低血压的比较
Comparison of remimazolam and ciprofol on post-induction hypotension in elderly patients
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2025.04.010
中文关键词: 瑞马唑仑  环泊酚  老年  慢诱导  诱导后低血压
英文关键词: Remimazolam  Ciprofol  Aged  Slow induction  Post-induction hypotension
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
赵丽霞 211112,南京医科大学附属逸夫医院麻醉科  
马潇 211112,南京医科大学附属逸夫医院麻醉科  
金文杰 南京医科大学第一附属医院麻醉与围术期医学科  
尹宁 211112,南京医科大学附属逸夫医院麻醉科 yinning882000@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 267
全文下载次数: 41
中文摘要:
      
目的:探讨瑞马唑仑与环泊酚在老年患者麻醉诱导后低血压(PIH)的比较。
方法:选择行腹股沟疝修补术的老年患者62例,男58例,女4例,年龄65~85岁,BMI 18.5~30.0 kg/m 2,ASA Ⅱ或Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为两组:瑞马唑仑组(R组)和环泊酚组(C组),每组31例。麻醉诱导时R组持续输注瑞马唑仑3 mg·kg-1·h-1,C组持续输注环泊酚6 mg·kg-1·h-1。记录PIH发生情况、最低MAP、诱导成功率、镇静药物用量、诱导时间和苏醒时间。记录麻醉诱导前、意识消失即刻、插管即刻、插管后5 min、切皮即刻HR和MAP。记录高血压、心动过速、心动过缓、呼吸抑制、注射痛、呃逆等不良反应发生情况。
结果:与C组比较,R组PIH发生率明显降低(P<0.05),最低MAP明显升高(P<0.05) 。两组诱导成功率均为100%,诱导期间累积镇静药物剂量分别为瑞马唑仑0.16 mg/kg和环泊酚0.29 mg/kg,两组诱导时间差异无统计学意义。与C组比较,R组苏醒时间明显延长(P<0.05),插管即刻、插管后5 min HR明显增快,插管后即刻MAP明显升高(P<0.05) 。两组高血压、心动过速、心动过缓和呼吸抑制发生率差异无统计学意义。两组无一例发生注射痛、呃逆、术后谵妄和术中知晓。
结论:两种诱导策略在老年患者中均能实现有效的麻醉诱导,持续输注瑞马唑仑3 mg·kg-1·h-1诱导麻醉能够显著减少PIH发生率,维持老年患者血流动力学稳定,且无严重不良反应发生,具有临床推广价值。
英文摘要:
      
Objective: To investigate the comparison between remimazolam and ciprofol on post-induction hypotension (PIH) in elderly patients.
Methods: Sixty-two elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair, 58 males, 4 females, aged 65-85 years, BMI 18.5-30.0 kg/m 2, ASA physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups: the remimazolam group (group R) and the ciprofol group (group C), 31 patients in each group. During anesthesia induction, group R received a continuous infusion of remimazolam at 3 mg·kg-1·h-1, while group C received a continuous infusion of ciprofol at 6 mg·kg-1·h-1. The incidence of PIH, minimum MAP, successful induction rate, sedative drug dosage, induction time, and recovery time were recorded. HR and MAP were recorded before induction, immediately after loss of consciousness, immediately after intubation, 5 minutes after intubation, and immediately after skin incision. Adverse events such as hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, respiratory depression, injection pain, and hiccups were also recorded.
Results: Compared with group C, the incidence of PIH was significantly lower in group R (P < 0.05), and the minimum MAP was significantly higher in group R (P < 0.05). The induction success rate was 100% in both groups. The cumulative sedative drug doses during induction were 0.16 mg/kg for remimazolam and 0.29 mg/kg for ciprofol, with no statistically significant difference in induction time between the two groups, group R had a significantly longer recovery time than group C (P < 0.05). HR was significantly increased immediately after intubation and 5 minutes after intubation in group R, and MAP was significantly higher immediately after intubation (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the incidence of hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, and respiratory depression. Neither group experienced injection pain, hiccups, postoperative delirium, or intraoperative awareness.
Conclusion: Both induction strategies effectively achieved anesthesia induction in elderly surgical patients. Continuous infusion of remimazolam at 3 mg·kg-1·h-1 significantly reduced the incidence of PIH, maintained hemodynamic stability in elderly patients, and did not cause severe adverse reactions, demonstrating significant clinical application value.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭