文章摘要
经皮穴位电刺激对腹腔镜非胃肠手术后恶心呕吐影响的Meta分析
Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic non-gastrointestinal surgery: a meta-analysis
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2024.09.012
中文关键词: 经皮穴位电刺激  术后恶心呕吐  腹腔镜  Meta分析
英文关键词: Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation  Postoperative nausea and vomiting  Laparoscopy  Meta-analysis
基金项目:甘肃省科技计划项目-青年科技基金(23JRRA1251);甘肃省科技计划项目-临床医学研究中心建设(20JR10RA435);甘肃省科技计划项目-重点研发计划(22YF7FA101,23YFFA0053)
作者单位E-mail
王彩红 730000兰州市甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院  
魏晓涛 甘肃省中医院骨科  
赵永强 甘肃省中医院泌尿外科  
徐紫清 甘肃省中医院麻醉疼痛医学中心 甘肃省中西医结合麻醉临床医学研究中心  
崔一阳 730000兰州市甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院  
周婷 730000兰州市甘肃中医药大学第一临床医学院  
薛建军 甘肃省中医院麻醉疼痛医学中心 甘肃省中西医结合麻醉临床医学研究中心 xuejjebm0419@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 1046
全文下载次数: 439
中文摘要:
      
目的:系统评价经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)治疗腹腔镜非胃肠手术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的影响。
方法:计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane library、Web of Science、Embase、中国知网、万方、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM),收集TEAS用于治疗腹腔镜非胃肠手术PONV的随机对照试验(RCT),检索时间为建库至2023年7月。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。
结果:最终纳入22篇RCTs,共纳入患者3 538例,其中TEAS组1 799例,对照组1 739例。Meta分析结果显示,与对照组比较,TEAS组术后0~24 h PONV发生率明显降低(RR=0.54,95%CI 0.44~0.68,P<0.001),术后补救性止吐例数明显降低(RR=0.54,95%CI 0.38~0.77,P<0.001)。两组术后穴位刺激相关不良反应发生率差异无统计学意义(RR=0.62,95%CI 0.15~2.51,P=0.500)。
结论:TEAS治疗腹腔镜非胃肠手术PONV具有良好的临床疗效及安全性。
英文摘要:
      
Objective: To systematically evaluate the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) in the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic non-gastrointestinal surgery.
Methods: Databases such as PubMed, Cochrane library, Web of Science, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang, and Chinese biomedical database (CBM) were searched to find and screen randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of TEAS in the prevention and treatment of PONV after laparoscopic non-gastrointestinal surgery. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to July 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.
Results: Twenty-two RCTs involving 3 538 patients were included, including 1 799 in the TEAS group and 1 739 in the control group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the total incidence of PONV in the TEAS group was significantly lower than that in the control group 0-24 hours after operation (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.44-0.68, P < 0.001 ), and the incidence of postoperative remedial antiemetic was significantly reduced (RR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.38-0.77, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative acupoint stimulation-related adverse reactions between the two groups (RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.15-2.51, P = 0.500).
Conclusion: TEAS has good clinical efficacy and safety in the treatment of PONV after laparoscopic non-gastrointestinal surgery.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭