文章摘要
无阿片类药物麻醉联合腰方肌阻滞在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的应用效果
Effect of opioid-free anesthesia combined with quadratus lumborum block in laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer resection
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2024.09.008
中文关键词: 无阿片类药物麻醉  腰方肌阻滞  结直肠癌  多模式镇痛
英文关键词: Opioid-free anesthesia  Quadratus lumborum block  Colorectal cancer  Multimodal analgesia
基金项目:宜昌市医疗卫生科研项目(A23-1-030)
作者单位E-mail
周维 443000三峡大学第一临床医学院 宜昌市中心人民医院麻醉科 三峡大学老年麻醉医学研究所  
王凯 443000三峡大学第一临床医学院 宜昌市中心人民医院麻醉科 三峡大学老年麻醉医学研究所  
舒爱华 443000三峡大学第一临床医学院 宜昌市中心人民医院麻醉科 三峡大学老年麻醉医学研究所  
程传喜 443000三峡大学第一临床医学院 宜昌市中心人民医院麻醉科 三峡大学老年麻醉医学研究所  
陈小波 443000三峡大学第一临床医学院 宜昌市中心人民医院麻醉科 三峡大学老年麻醉医学研究所 A15871583801@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 920
全文下载次数: 554
中文摘要:
      
目的:探讨无阿片类药物麻醉(OFA)联合腰方肌阻滞(QLB)在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的应用效果。
方法:选择2023年3—12月行腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术患者70例,男49例,女21例,年龄18~75岁,BMI 18.5~28.0 kg/m2,ASA Ⅱ或Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组:无阿片组(OFA组)和常规阿片组(OA组),每组35例。OFA组在麻醉诱导前行超声引导下双侧后路QLB(每侧予0.25%罗哌卡因30 ml),麻醉诱导和维持采用艾司氯胺酮、利多卡因等OFA方案;OA组不行QLB,麻醉诱导和维持采用含阿片类药物方案。记录麻醉诱导前(T0)、气管插管后1 min(T1)、气腹建立前(T2)、气腹建立后1 min(T3)、手术开始后1 h(T4)、手术结束即刻(T5)、离室时(T6)的HR和MAP。记录术中低血压、高血压、心动过缓、心动过速等不良反应的发生情况。记录拔管时间、PACU停留时间、离室时Steward苏醒评分和离室时VAS疼痛评分。记录术后6、12、24、48 h静息和活动时NRS评分。记录首次肛门排气时间、首次下床活动时间、术后住院时间、术后48 h内镇痛泵有效按压次数和补救镇痛例数。记录术后48 h内恶心呕吐、幻觉等不良反应的发生情况。
结果:与T0时比较,两组T1、T2、T4、T5时MAP均明显降低(P<0.05);OFA组T1时HR明显增快,T4、T5时HR明显减慢(P<0.05);OA组T1—T5时HR明显减慢(P<0.05)。与OA组比较,OFA组T1—T3时HR明显增快,T1时MAP明显升高(P<0.05),OFA组拔管时间、PACU停留时间明显延长(P<0.05),离室时Steward苏醒评分明显降低(P<0.05),术后6、12、24、48 h活动时NRS评分明显降低(P<0.05),术后首次肛门排气时间、首次下床活动时间和术后住院时间明显缩短(P<0.05),镇痛泵有效按压次数明显减少(P<0.05),补救镇痛率、术中低血压和术后恶心呕吐发生率明显降低(P<0.05)。
结论:OFA联合QLB能够安全有效地完成腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术,麻醉诱导和术中的血流动力学更加平稳,且术后镇痛效果好、补救镇痛需求和术后恶心呕吐更少,对胃肠道功能恢复更有优势。
英文摘要:
      
Objective: To explore the effect of opioid-free anesthesia (OFA) combined with quadratus lumborum block (QLB) in laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer resection.
Methods: Sventy patients were selected for undergoing laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer resection from March to December 2023, 49 males and 21 females, aged 18-75 years, BMl 18.5-28.0 kg/m2, ASA physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ. The patients were divided into two groups using random number table method: the OFA group (group OFA) and the conventional opioid anesthesia group (group OA), 35 patients in each group. Group OFA underwent bilateral posterior QLB under ultrasound guidance before anesthesia induction (0.25% ropivacaine 30 ml on each side), and anesthesia induction and maintenance were performed using opioid-free anesthesia regimen. And group OA cannot undergo QLB, and anesthesia induction and maintenance were carried out using opioid containing regimen. The patient's HR and MAP were recorded before anesthesia induction (T0), 1 minute after endotracheal intubation (T1), before pneumoperitoneum establishment (T2), 1 minute after pneumoperitoneum establishment (T3), 1 hour after surgery (T4), the end of surgery (T5), and leaving the operating room (T6). The time from the patient's anesthetic discontinuation to extubation, the length of stay in the PACU, and the Steward and VAS pain scores when the patient leaves the operating room, which were recorded. NRS scores at rest and in the motor state 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery, time to first exhaust, time to first ambulation, and length of postoperative hospital stay, effective PCIA pressing times and use of additional analgesic drugs within 48 hours after the operation, and postoperative adverse reactions (nausea, vomiting, hallucinations) were also recorded.
Results: Compared with T0, the MAP of the two groups decreased significantly at T1, T2, T4, and T5(P < 0.05), the HR in group OFA increased significantly at T1 and slowed down at T4 and T5(P < 0.05), and the HR in group OA decreased significantly at T1-T5(P < 0.05). Compared with group OA, the HR in group OFA increased significantly at T1-T3, and the MAP increased significantly at T1(P < 0.05). Compared with group OA, the extubation time and PACU residence time were significantly delayed (P < 0.05), and the Steward score when leaving the operating room was significantly lower in group OFA (P < 0.05). Compared with group OA, NRS score was significantly deceased 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after the surgery (P < 0.05), time to first exhaust, time to first ambulation, and length of postoperative hospital stay were significantly shartened (P < 0.05), and effective PCIA pressing times and additional analgesia times were significantly decreased (P < 0.05), incidence of intraoperative hypotensionand postoperative nausea and vomiting (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: OFA combined with QLB can safely and effectively complete laparoscopic radical colorectal cancer surgery. Patients with such anesthetic methods are hemodynamically more stable during anesthesia induction and intraoperatively. These patients have better postoperative analgesia and less need for additional analgesics, and less incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. This approach is more beneficial for the recovery of the patient's gastrointestinal function.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭