文章摘要
经皮穴位电刺激对老年患者腰椎融合内固定术围术期镇痛效果的影响
Effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation on perioperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion internal fixation
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2024.09.007
中文关键词: 腰椎融合内固定术  竖脊肌平面阻滞  经皮穴位电刺激  老年  镇痛
英文关键词: Lumbar fusion internal fixation  Erector spinoid plane block  Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation  Aged  Analgesia
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
何庆标 510405广州中医药大学第一附属医院麻醉科 广东省中医临床研究院  
黎玉辉 510405广州中医药大学第一附属医院麻醉科 广东省中医临床研究院 Liyuhui1531@gzucm.edu.cn 
梁雨晴 510405广州中医药大学第一附属医院麻醉科 广东省中医临床研究院  
摘要点击次数: 738
全文下载次数: 437
中文摘要:
      
目的:探讨经皮穴位电刺激(TEAS)对老年患者腰椎融合内固定术围术期镇痛效果的影响。
方法:选择择期行两个节段以内腰椎减压融合内固定术的老年患者82例,男57例,女25例,年龄65~74岁,BMI 18.5~24.0 kg/m2,ASA Ⅰ—Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组:TEAS组和对照组,每组41例。两组均采用气管插管静脉全身麻醉。TEAS组于麻醉诱导前30 min行TEAS,持续至术毕,术后连续2 d行TEAS,每天1次,每次30 min,刺激穴位取双侧合谷穴、内关穴、足三里穴。对照组于相同穴位上贴电极片,不进行电刺激。两组于麻醉诱导后在超声引导下行双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)。术毕连接镇痛泵行PCIA。记录穴位刺激前、切皮时的HR、MAP。记录术中丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼用量和舒芬太尼追加次数,并计算追加率。记录术后2、4、8、12、24、48 h静息和活动(翻身)时的VAS疼痛评分。记录镇痛泵首次按压时间、术后48 h内舒芬太尼用量、镇痛泵有效按压次数与实际按压次数之比(D1/D2)、补救镇痛和术后不良反应发生情况。
结果:与对照组比较,TEAS组切皮时HR明显减慢,MAP明显降低,术中舒芬太尼追加率明显降低,术后2、4、8、12、24、48 h活动时VAS疼痛评分明显降低,术后12、24、48 h静息时VAS疼痛评分明显降低,镇痛泵首次按压时间明显延长,术后48 h内舒芬太尼用量明显减少,D1/D2明显升高,补救镇痛率、术后恶心呕吐与头晕发生率明显降低(P<0.05)。
结论:TEAS为老年患者腰椎融合内固定术提供较好的围术期镇痛效果,减少阿片类药物用量,延长术后镇痛时间,并降低术后不良反应的发生率。
英文摘要:
      
Objective: To explore the effect of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) on perioperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion internal fixation.
Methods: Eighty-two elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion internal fixation within two levels, 57 males and 25 females, aged 65-74 years, BMI 18.5-24.0 kg/m2, ASA physical status Ⅰ-Ⅲ, were randomly divided into two groups: TEAS group and control group, 41 patients in each group. Both groups were given tracheal intubation intravenous general anesthesia. TEAS group was treated with TEAS from 30 minutes before anesthesia induction to the end of the operation, and continued TEAS for 2 days after surgery, once a day, 30 minutes once time, and the stimulation sites were bilateral Hegu, Neiguan, and Zusanli. In the control group, the electrodes were only connected at the same time point without electrical stimulation. Both groups were treated with bilateral erector spinae plane block (ESPB) under ultrasound guidance after anesthesia induction. PCIA was performed by connecting the analgesic pump after operation. HR and MAP before stimulation and at the time of skin incision were recorded. The dosage of propofol and remifentanil and the number of sufentanil additions during operation were recorded. The addition rate of sufentanil was calculated. The resting and activity VAS pain scores 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation were recorded. First compression time of analgesic pump, the consumption of sufentanil 48 hours after operation, the ratio of effective pressing times of analgesic pump to actual pressing times (D1/D2), rescue analgesia rate and adverse reactions were recorded.
Results: Compared with control group, HR was slowed down significantly and MAP was decreased significantly at the time of skin incision in TEAS group, the rate of sufentanil additions, the activity VAS scores 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation , the resting VAS pain scores 12, 24, and 48 hours after operation in TEAS group were significantly decreased,the first compression time of analgesic pump was significantly prolonged, the consumption of sufentanil 48 hours after operation was significantly decreased, D1/D2 was significantly increased, the rate of rescue analgesia, nausea and vomiting, dizziness were significantly decreased (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: TEAS can provide better analgesia for elderly patients undergoing lumbar fusion internal fixation, reduce the use of opioids, prolong the postoperative analgesia time and reduce the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭