文章摘要
连续髋关节囊周围神经阻滞与连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞对老年全髋关节置换术患者围术期镇痛效果影响的比较
Comparison of continuous pericapsular nerve group block and continuous fascia iliaca compartment block for perioperative analgesia in elderly patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2023.03.006
中文关键词: 全髋关节置换术  连续外周神经阻滞  髋关节囊周围神经阻滞  髂筋膜间隙阻滞  镇痛
英文关键词: Total hip arthroplasty  Continuous peripheral nerve blocks  Pericapsular nerve group block  Fascia iliaca compartment block  Analgesia
基金项目:山东省济南市临床医学科技创新计划(202019018)
作者单位E-mail
李咸鹏 261053,潍坊医学院麻醉学院  
郑煜丽 锦州医科大学中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院研究生培养基地  
高晓曼 锦州医科大学中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院研究生培养基地  
徐琥钧 261053,潍坊医学院麻醉学院  
刘鹏程 锦州医科大学中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院研究生培养基地  
韩妤妤 261053,潍坊医学院麻醉学院  
高成杰 锦州医科大学中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院麻醉科  
王飞 锦州医科大学中国人民解放军联勤保障部队第九六〇医院麻醉科 wf_king_001@163.com 
摘要点击次数: 1827
全文下载次数: 396
中文摘要:
      
目的 比较连续髋关节囊周围神经阻滞(PENGB)和连续髂筋膜间隙阻滞(FICB)在老年全髋关节置换术患者围术期的镇痛效果。
方法 选择行全髋关节置换术的老年患者50例,男22例,女28例,年龄65~85岁,BMI 18~30 kg/m 2,ASA Ⅱ或Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组:连续PENGB组(P组)和连续FICB组(F组),每组25例。P组在全麻诱导前实施超声引导下连续PENGB,给予0.375%罗哌卡因20 ml。F组在全麻诱导前实施超声引导下连续FICB,给予0.375%罗哌卡因30 ml。两组患者术毕行神经阻滞自控镇痛。记录阻滞前即刻、术后3、6、12、24和48 h 静息和活动(被动直腿抬高45°)时VAS疼痛评分,神经阻滞操作时间、丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量,术后12、24和48 h 下肢运动阻滞改良Bromage评分,术后补救镇痛情况、术前等待时间和术后住院时间,恶心呕吐、局麻药中毒、神经损伤、导管移位和脱出、血肿、穿刺部位感染等情况。
结果 与阻滞前即刻比较,术后3、6、12、24和48 h 两组静息和活动时VAS疼痛评分明显降低(P<0.05)。与F组比较,P组术后6和12 h 活动时VAS疼痛评分明显降低(P<0.05), 术后12、24和48 h下肢运动阻滞改良Bromage评分明显降低(P<0.05),神经阻滞操作时间明显缩短(P<0.05)。两组丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼用量、术后补救镇痛情况、术前等待时间和术后住院时间差异无统计学意义。两组均未发生恶心呕吐、局麻药中毒、神经损伤、导管移位或脱出、血肿、穿刺部位感染等情况。
结论 连续PENGB和FICB均可持续减轻老年全髋关节置换术患者围术期疼痛,连续PENGB更能够减轻患者活动时疼痛,并保留下肢肌力,有利于术后早期康复。
英文摘要:
      
Ojective To compare the efficacy of continuous pericapsular nerve group block (PENGB) and continuous fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) in the elderly undergoing total hip arthroplasty.
Methods Fifty patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, 22 males and 28 females, aged 65-85 years, BMI 18-30 kg/m 2, ASA physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ, were randomly divided into two groups: the continuous PENGB group (group P) and the continuous FICB group (group F), 25 patients in each group. In group P, ultrasound-guided continuous PENGB was performed before induction of general anesthesia, and 0.375% ropivacaine 20 ml was administered. In group F, ultrasound-guided continuous FICB was performed before induction of general anesthesia, and 0.375% ropivacaine 30 ml was administered. Postoperatively, patients in both groups underwent patient-controlled nerve block analgesia. VAS pain scores at rest and movement (passive straight leg elevation for 45°) were recorded immediately before the nerve block, at 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. Assessment of patients with lower limb motor block at 12, 24, and 48 hours was graded using the modified Bromage score. The procedure time of the nerve block, the intraoperative consumption of propofol and remifentanil, postoperative remedial analgesia, length of stay before the operation, postoperative length of stay, nausea and vomiting, local anesthetic intoxication, nerve injury, catheter displacement and prolapse, hematoma, puncture site infection, and other adverse conditions were recorded.
Results Compared with the VAS pain scores immediately before the nerve block, the VAS pain scores at rest and movement 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery were significantly lower in both groups (P < 0.05). In both groups, the VAS scores at movement were lower in group P than those in group F 6 and 12 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). The lower limb motor block modified Bromage scores 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery were lower in group P than those in group F (P < 0.05). The onset of nerve block of group P took less time than that of group F (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the propofol and remifentanil consumption, postoperative remedial analgesia, length of stay before the operation, and postoperative length of stay between the two groups. No adverse conditions such as nausea and vomiting, local anesthetic intoxication, nerve injury, catheter displacement or prolapse, hematoma, or puncture site infection occurred in either group.
Conclusion Both the continuous pericapsular nerve group block and the continuous fascia iliaca compartment block can consistently alleviate perioperative pain in the elderly undergoing total hip arthroplasty, while the continuous pericapsular nerve group block is more capable of reducing patients' active pain and preserving lower limb muscle strength, which is beneficial to patients' early postoperative recovery.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭