|
| 近红外光谱监测局部组织氧饱和度评估臂丛神经阻滞的效果 |
| Near-infrared spectroscopy monitoring local tissue oxygen saturation for evaluating the effects of brachial plexus block |
| |
| DOI：10.12089/jca.2022.11.001 |
| 中文关键词: 近红外光谱 局部组织氧饱和度 受试者工作特征曲线 臂丛神经阻滞 |
| 英文关键词: Near infrared spectrum Tissue oxygen saturation Receiver operating characteristic curve Brachial plexus block |
| 基金项目:浙江省台州市A类科技计划（21ywa56） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 943 |
| 全文下载次数: 281 |
| 中文摘要: |
目的 使用近红外光谱（NIRS）监测局部组织氧饱和度（StO2），观察臂丛神经阻滞对前臂局部组织灌注的影响，并探讨StO2评估臂丛神经阻滞效果的有效性。
方法 选择行择期骨科前臂手术患者43例，男24例，女19例，年龄18～64岁，BMI 20～28 kg/m2，ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级。超声引导下行锁骨上臂丛神经阻滞，注射0.375%罗哌卡因20 ml。根据阻滞后20 min是否成功分为两组:阻滞成功组（Y组）和阻滞失败组（N组）。记录阻滞即刻、阻滞后5、10、15、20 min时HR、MAP和SpO2，阻滞侧和非阻滞侧StO2，计算上述时点阻滞侧与非阻滞侧StO2的差值（ΔStO2），绘制阻滞后5、10 min时ΔStO2的受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线预测阻滞效果，并计算曲线下面积（AUC）和95%可信区间 （CI）。
结果 本研究最终阻滞成功38例（88.4%）。与非阻滞侧比较，阻滞后5、10、15、20 min Y组阻滞侧StO2明显升高（P<0.05）。N组不同时点阻滞侧与非阻滞侧StO2差异无统计学意义。与阻滞即刻比较，阻滞后5、10、15、20 min Y组ΔStO2明显升高（P<0.05）。N组不同时点ΔStO2差异无统计学意义。阻滞后5 min ΔStO2预测臂丛神经阻滞效果的AUC为0.884（95%CI 0.755～1.000），临界值3.867%，敏感性67.5%，特异性100%。阻滞后10 min ΔStO2预测臂丛神经阻滞效果的AUC为0.950（95%CI 0.885～1.000），临界值3.856%，敏感性90.0%，特异性100%。
结论 臂丛神经阻滞明显增加前臂局部组织氧饱和度，近红外光谱监测局部组织氧饱和度可作为早期预测臂丛神经阻滞效果的指标。 |
| 英文摘要: |
Ojective To investigate the effects of supraclavicular brachial plexus block on tissue perfusion of the forearm and explore the feasibility of tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) in evaluating the success of brachial plexus block.
Methods Forty-three patients undergoing elective orthopedic forearm surgery were selected, including 24 males and 19 females, aged 18-64 years, BMI 20-28 kg/m2, ASA physical statusⅠ or Ⅱ. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block was performed, and 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine was injected. According to whether the block was successful or not 20 minutes after block, they were divided into a successful group (group Y) and a failure group (group N). HR, MAP and SpO2 at the moment of block and 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after block were recorded, and the StO2 on both the blocking side and the non-blocking side were recorded and the difference (ΔStO2) was calculated at the above time points. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of ΔStO2 at 5 and 10 minutes after block was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated to predict the effect of brachial plexus block.
Results Thirty-eight patients (88.4%) were successfully blocked in this study. Compared with the non-blocked side, the StO2 of the blocked side in group Y was significantly higher 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after the block (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in StO2 between the block side and the non-block side at different time points in group N. Compared with immediately after block, ΔStO2 in group Y was significantly higher 5, 10, 15, and 20 minutes after block (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in ΔStO2 at different time points in group N. Five minutes after the block, the AUC of ΔStO2 to predict the effects of brachial plexus block was 0.884 (95% CI 0.755-1.000), the cutoff value was 3.867%, the sensitivity was 67.5%, and the specificity was 100%. Ten minutes after the block, the AUC of ΔStO2 to predict the effects of brachial plexus block was 0.950 (95% CI 0.885-1.000), the cutoff value was 3.856%, the sensitivity was 90.0%, and the specificity was 100%.
Conclusion Brachial plexus block significantly increase the StO2 of forearm, and the monitoring of StO2 by NIRS can be used as an indicator for early prediction of the effects of brachial plexus block. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
