文章摘要
竖脊肌平面阻滞对袖状胃切除术患者术后恢复质量的影响
Effect of erector spinae plane block on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2021.07.009
中文关键词: 竖脊肌平面阻滞  肥胖  袖状胃切除术  恢复质量
英文关键词: Erector spinal plane block  Obesity  Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy  Quality of recovery
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
王琰 450052,郑州大学第一附属医院麻醉与围术期医学部(现在郑州大学附属郑州中心医院麻醉与围术期医学科)  
左珊珊 郑州大学附属郑州中心医院麻醉与围术期医学科  
马艳玲 郑州大学附属郑州中心医院麻醉与围术期医学科  
储勤军 郑州大学附属郑州中心医院麻醉与围术期医学科  
杨建军 450052,郑州大学第一附属医院麻醉与围术期医学部 yjyangjj@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 2140
全文下载次数: 803
中文摘要:
      
目的 观察竖脊肌平面阻滞(ESPB)对肥胖患者袖状胃切除术后恢复质量的影响。
方法 选择拟行腹腔镜袖状胃切除术患者98例,男9例,女89例,年龄18~64岁,BMI≥28 kg/m2,ASA Ⅱ或Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为两组:ESPB组(E组,n=50)和对照组(C组,n=48)。E组全麻诱导前行超声引导下每侧ESPB 0.33%罗哌卡因30 ml;C组行单纯全麻。两组全麻方案相同。术前及术后24、48 h进行恢复质量15 (QoR-15)量表评估。记录术后0.5、2、6、12、24、48 h静息和活动时VAS疼痛评分。记录术后48 h内镇痛泵按压次数、术后镇痛类药物累计消耗量及补救镇痛例数。记录PACU停留时间、首次下床时间、首次排气时间和住院时间。记录术后头晕、恶心、呕吐、呼吸等并发症发生情况。
结果 术前及术后24、48 h两组QoR-15总体评分差异无统计学意义。术后12 h E组活动时VAS疼痛评分明显低于C组(P<0.05),其余时点两组VAS疼痛评分差异无统计学意义。术后48 h内两组镇痛泵按压次数、镇痛药物累计消耗量、补救镇痛率差异无统计学意义。两组PACU停留时间、首次下床时间、首次排气时间、住院时间以及并发症发生率差异无统计学意义。
结论 与单纯全麻比较,全麻联合单次竖脊肌平面阻滞未能显著改善腹腔镜袖状胃切除术后恢复质量,但可增强镇痛效果。
英文摘要:
      
Objective To observe the effect of erector spinae plane block (ESPB) on the quality of recovery (QoR) in obese patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.
Methods Ninty-eight patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, 9 males and 89 females, aged 18-64 years, BMI ≥28 kg/m2, ASA physical status Ⅱ or Ⅲ, were randomly divided into two groups: ESPB group (group E, n = 50) and control group (group C, n = 48). The patients in group E received ultrasound-guide before general anesthesia, with 0.33% ropivacaine 30 ml per side. The 15-item quality of recovery questionnaire (QoR-15) was evaluated preoperatively and postoperative 24 and 48 hours. Self-reported VAS scores at rest and on movement were recorded 0.5, 2, 6, 12, 24 and 48 hours after operation. The number of analgesic pump pressings, the cumulative consumption of postoperative analgesics and the rate of rescue analgesia were recorded within 48 hours after the operation. The incidence of dizziness, postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV), respiratory complications and nerve block related complications were also recorded. Moreover, postanesthesia care unit (PACU) discharge time, postoperative activity time, intestinal exhaust time and the length of hospital stay were recorded.
Results There were no significant differences in QoR-15 overall scores between the two groups 24 and 48 hours after operation. Compared with group C, group E reduced VAS scores on movement 12 hours after operation (P < 0.05), and there was no significant difference in VAS pain score between the two groups at the rest of the time. There was no significant difference in the number of times of analgesia pump pressing, cumulative consumption of analgesics and rescue analgesia rate within 48 hours after operation between the two groups. There were no significant differences in postoperative dizziness, postoperative nausea or vomiting, respiratory complications, PACU discharge time, postoperative activity time, intestinal exhaust time and length of hospital stay between the two groups.
Conclusion Although single erector spinal block did not significantly improve the recovery quality after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, it could enhance the analgesic effect.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭