文章摘要
布托啡诺对患者自控硬膜外镇痛罗哌卡因EC50的影响
Effect of butorphanol on the EC50 of ropivacaine during patient-controlled epidural analgesia
  
DOI:10.12089/jca.2020.07.010
中文关键词: 布托啡诺  患者自控硬膜外镇痛  罗哌卡因  半数效应浓度
英文关键词: Butorphanol  Patient-controlled epidural analgesia  Ropivacaine  Median effect concentration
基金项目:
作者单位E-mail
宋丹丹 628000,四川省广元市中心医院麻醉科  
罗一 628000,四川省广元市中心医院麻醉科  
吴乐 川北医学院附属医院麻醉科  
高晓沛 川北医学院附属医院麻醉科  
汪芳俊 川北医学院附属医院麻醉科 wfjlxy006@126.com 
摘要点击次数: 2738
全文下载次数: 506
中文摘要:
      
目的 观察布托啡诺对患者自控硬膜外镇痛罗哌卡因EC50的影响。
方法 择期行胃癌根治术患者64例,男38例,女26例,年龄43~58岁,BMI 21~24 kg/m2,ASA Ⅰ或Ⅱ级。随机分为两组:罗哌卡因组(R组)和布托啡诺复合罗哌卡因组(BR组),每组32例。所有患者选择T8-9间隙行硬膜外穿刺并置管。R组硬膜外镇痛泵配方为罗哌卡因和生理盐水混合液共100 ml,BR组硬膜外镇痛泵配方为罗哌卡因、布托啡诺5 mg和生理盐水的混合液共100 ml,采用序贯法测定罗哌卡因浓度,初始浓度为0.1%,相邻药物浓度比值为1.2。采用Dixon-Massey法确定罗哌卡因EC50及其95%CI。术后2 h患者VAS评分<3分则镇痛有效,VAS评分≥3分则镇痛无效。记录患者术前15 min(T0)、术后1 h(T1)、术后3h(T2)、术后6 h(T3)、术后12 h(T4)、术后24 h(T5)、术后48 h(T6)HR、MAP和RR,并进行VAS评分,运动阻滞评分。观察两组患者术后恶心呕吐、嗜睡、皮肤瘙痒和尿潴留等不良反应的发生情况并记录。
结果 R组EC50为0.19%(95%CI 0.17%~0.20%);DR组EC50为0.11%(95%CI 0.10%~0.12%)。两组T0—T6时HR、MAP、RR和VAS评分差异无统计学意义;R组运动阻滞评分达到1分的发生率明显高于BR组(P<0.05),R组恶心发生率明显高于BR组(P<0.05)。两组均无皮肤瘙痒、尿潴留和嗜睡等不良反应发生。
结论 布托啡诺可增强罗哌卡因PCEA镇痛效果,降低罗哌卡因浓度,对患者呼吸循环无影响,不伴有皮肤瘙痒和恶心呕吐。
英文摘要:
      
Objective To observe the effect of butorphanol on the EC50 of ropivacaine during patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA).
Methods Sixty-four patients undergoing radical gastrectomy, 38 males and 26 females, aged 43-58 years, BMI 21-24 kg/m2, ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, were randomly divided into 2 groups: ropivacaine group (group R, n = 32) and butorphanol combined with ropivacaine group (group BR, n = 32). All patients underwent epidural puncture and catheterization at T8-9. The epidural analgesia pump in group R was prepared with ropivacaine and normal saline, and in group BR was prepared with ropivacaine, butorphineol 5 mg and normal saline, the volumes in two groups were 100 ml. The concentrations of ropivacaine were measured by sequential method, the initial concentration was 0.1%, and the ratio of adjacent drug concentration was 1.2. EC50 and 95% CI of Ropivacaine were determined by Dixon-Massey method. VAS score < 3 was defined as effective for analgesia, while VAS score ≥ 3 was defined as ineffective for analgesia. The HR, BP, RR and VAS score of patients were recorded 15 min before operation (T0), 1 h (T1), 3 h (T2), 6 h (T3), 12 h (T4), 24 h (T5) and 48 h (T6) postoperatively. Motor block scores were also recorded during PCEA. Postoperative nausea, vomiting and drowsiness were observed and recorded in the two groups.
Results The EC50 of group R was 0.19% (95% CI 0.17%-0.20%). The EC50 of group BR was 0.11% (95% CI 0.10%-0.12%). There was no significant difference in HR, BP, RR and VAS scores between the two groups at each time point. Compared to group BR, the incidences of motor block score of 1 and nausea were higher in group R (P < 0.05).
Conclusion Butorphineol can enhance the analgesic effect of ropivacaine without respiratory depression, pruritus, nausea and vomiting during postoperative PCEA.
查看全文   查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭