|
| 中文版Hawkins全身麻醉患者满意度问卷的信效度研究 |
| Reliability and validity analysis of the Chinese version of Hawkins general anesthesia patient satisfaction questionnaire |
| |
| DOI：10.12089/jca.2019.11.014 |
| 中文关键词: 全身麻醉 患者满意度 问卷 信度 效度 |
| 英文关键词: General anesthesia Patient satisfaction Questionnaire Reliability Validity |
| 基金项目:上海交通大学医学院护理科研基金（Jyhz1703） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 2768 |
| 全文下载次数: 921 |
| 中文摘要: |
目的 分析中文版Hawkins全身麻醉患者满意度问卷的信效度。
方法 采用专家评价法、条目区分度对问卷条目进行删减;对378例全身麻醉患者进行大样本测试,并进行信度、重测信度及结构效度检验。
结果 将Hawkins全身麻醉患者满意度问卷中文版修订为9个维度22个条目,条目平均内容效度(I-CVI)为0.87(0.80～1.00),总问卷内容效度(S-CVI/UA)为0.87;条目间差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05);探索性因子分析提取8个公因子解释累计方差贡献率为80.194％;验证性因子分析显示数据与模型拟合良好;问卷总Cronbach α系数为0.865(0.730～0.946),维度间重测信度Pearson相关系数为0.723～1.000。
结论 中文版Hawkins全身麻醉患者满意度问卷信效度良好。 |
| 英文摘要: |
Ojective To analyze the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Hawkins general anesthesia patient satisfaction questionnaire.
Methods The questionnaire’s item were deleted by expert evaluation and item discrimination method. A large sample test was conducted on 378 patients with general anesthesia, in order to test the reliability, test-retest reliability and structural validity.
Results The Chinese version of Hawkins general anesthesia patient satisfaction questionnaire was revised to 9 dimensions and 22 items. The average content validity (I-CVI) of the items was 0.87 (0.80-1.00), the content validity (S-CVI/UA) of the total scale was 0.87. The discriminant of the items was statistically significant. The exploratory factor analysis extracted 8 common factors to explain the cumulative variance contribution rate of 80.194％; the confirmatory factor analysis showed that the data fit well with the model; the total Cronbach α of the questionnaire was 0.865 (0.730-0.946), the Pearson correlation coefficient for each dimension in retest reliability was 0.723-1.000.
Conclusion The Chinese version of the Hawkins general anesthesia patient satisfaction questionnaire has good reliability and validity. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
