|
| 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞和椎板后阻滞联合全身麻醉用于脊椎手术的比较 |
| Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and retrolaminal block combined with general anesthesia for patients undergoing vertebral surgery |
| |
| DOI：10.12089/jca.2019.03.018 |
| 中文关键词: 竖脊肌平面阻滞 椎板后阻滞 后入路脊椎手术 超声引导 脊神经后支 VAS评分 |
| 英文关键词: Erector spinae plane block Retrolaminal block Posterior approach vertebral surgery Ultrasound-guided Posterior ramus of spinal nerve VAS score |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 4308 |
| 全文下载次数: 1090 |
| 中文摘要: |
目的 观察和对比超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞（ESPB）和椎板后阻滞（RLB）在后入路脊椎手术中的应用效果。
方法 选择2017年5月至2018年1月择期行后入路脊椎手术的患者60例，男35例，女25例，年龄45~65岁，BMI 18~32 kg/m2，ASA Ⅰ 或 Ⅱ 级。随机分为超声引导下双侧ESPB组（ESPB组）、超声引导下双侧RLB组（RLB组）和对照组（C组），每组20例。手术开始前，取俯卧位，ESPB组和RLB组均采用旁矢状位平面内法超声引导，ESPB组引导穿刺针至横突后表面，RLB组引导穿刺针至椎板后表面，每侧注入0.4%的罗哌卡因20 ml。C组不予阻滞，三组均予全身麻醉。记录三组术中舒芬太尼、瑞芬太尼和顺式阿曲库铵的用量、尿量、出血量和气管导管拔管时间。记录三组术后4、12、24、48 h VAS评分；记录ESPB组和RLB组患者术后48 h内穿刺部位疼痛，肿胀和感染等不良反应发生情况。
结果 ESPB组和RLB组舒芬太尼用量、瑞芬太尼用量和顺式阿曲库铵用量明显低于C组（P<0.05）。三组术中尿量、出血量和气管导管拔管时间差异无统计学意义。术后4、12、24、48 h ESPB组和RLB组 VAS评分明显低于C组(P<0.01)，ESPB组和RLB组术后48 h内均未发生穿刺部位疼痛、肿胀和感染等不良反应。
结论 超声引导下双侧ESPB和RLB联合全身麻醉均能够减少后入路脊椎手术中阿片类药物和肌松药用量，不影响术中尿量、出血量和气管导管拔管时间，并能够提供良好的术后镇痛效果。 |
| 英文摘要: |
Objective To compare the clinical effects of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block(ESPB) and retrolaminal block(RLB) during posterior approach vertebral surgery.
Methods Sixty patients, 35 males and 25 females, aged 45 - 65 years, BMI 18 - 32 kg/m2, ASA physical status Ⅰ or Ⅱ, scheduled for elective posterior approach vertebral surgery from May 2017 to January 2018, were included and randomly divided into three groups (n = 20): group ESPB, group RLB and control group (group C). Both of the two trial groups were ultrasound-guided using parasagittal in-plane method before surgery in prone position except for group C. General anesthesia was applied in all three groups . 20 ml of 0.4% ropivacaine was injected into the posterior surface of transverse process in group ESPB or the posterior surface of laminar in group RLB. Sufentanil, remifentanil and cisatracurium consumption, urine volume, blood loss, extubation time and VAS score at 4, 12, 24, 48 h after operation were recorded. The adverse reactions such as pain, swelling and infection were recorded within 48 hours after operation in group ESPB and group RLB.
Results Comparing with group C, both of the group ESPB and group RLB had a significant decrease in sufentanil, remifentanil, and cisatracurium consumption (P < 0.05), a similar urine volume and blood loss, a similar extubation time, and a prominent reduced VAS score at 4, 12, 24, 48 h after operation (P < 0.01). No pain, swelling or infection of the puncture site occurred within 48 hours after surgery in any of the two block groups.
Conclusion Both ultrasound-guided bilateral ESPB and RLB combined with general anesthesia significantly decrease the opioid consumption and muscle relaxant consumption without impact on urine volume, blood loss and extubation time during posterior approach vertebral surgery， and provide satisfactory postoperative analgesia. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|
